Boards Results

2020 ROCKINGHAM TEAMS - MATCH 5

Board No: 10
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -290

Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 DUTTON Team 3 RHODES Team 3NT E 6S 7 200 13 -13

2 MELTON Team 7 MCNEILL Team 3NT E 3H 9 600 0 0

3 RHODES Team 1 DUTTON Team 3NT E 4D 9 600 -13 13

4 HAMMOND Team 8 HAVAS Team 3NT E 8D 8 100 0 0

5 HARDMAN Team 17 HOOD Team 3NT E 5S 6 300 14 -14

6 CRANSBERG Team 10 TENNYSON Team 3NT E 4D 8 100 12 -12

7 MCNEILL Team 2 MELTON Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 0 0

8 HAVAS Team 4 HAMMOND Team 3NT E 4D 8 100 0 0

9 ARENDTS Team 11 DUPONT Team 3NT E 4D 8 100 0 0

10 TENNYSON Team 6 CRANSBERG Team 3NT E 5S 9 600 -12 12

11 DUPONT Team 9 ARENDTS Team 3NT E 4D 8 100 0 0

12 MCCONNELL Team 18 JACOBSEN Team 3NT E 2S 8 100 12 -12

13 HAWKER Team 15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team 3NT E 4D 9 600 -12 12

14 CAYLEY Team 19 HARDIE Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 0 0

15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team 13 HAWKER Team 3NT E 4D 8 100 12 -12

16 SINGH Team 20 DAVEY Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 0 0

17 HOOD Team 5 HARDMAN Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 -14 14

18 JACOBSEN Team 12 MCCONNELL Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 -12 12

19 HARDIE Team 14 CAYLEY Team 3NT E 7H 9 600 0 0

20 DAVEY Team 16 SINGH Team 3NT E TH 9 600 0 0

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 10

BD: 10 Q6 Dlr: E

AJ952 Vul: Both

J973

96

A87 KJT5432

KT7 Q4

AKT64 Q5

T7 AQ

9

863

82

KJ85432

NT

N 1 - - - - 8

S 1 - - - - 14 14

E - 4 1 6 6 4

W - 4 1 6 6

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by EW -3 300 1
3NT by EW -2 200 1
3NT by EW -1 100 7
3NT by EW = -600 11

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	3 RHODES Team	3NT E	6S	7	200		13	-13
2 MELTON Team	7 MCNEILL Team	3NT E	3H	9		600	0	0
3 RHODES Team	1 DUTTON Team	3NT E	4D	9		600	-13	13
4 HAMMOND Team	8 HAVAS Team	3NT E	8D	8	100		0	0
5 HARDMAN Team	17 HOOD Team	3NT E	5S	6	300		14	-14
6 CRANSBERG Team	10 TENNYSON Team	3NT E	4D	8	100		12	-12
7 MCNEILL Team	2 MELTON Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	0	0
8 HAVAS Team	4 HAMMOND Team	3NT E	4D	8	100		0	0
9 ARENDTS Team	11 DUPONT Team	3NT E	4D	8	100		0	0
10 TENNYSON Team	6 CRANSBERG Team	3NT E	5S	9		600	-12	12
11 DUPONT Team	9 ARENDTS Team	3NT E	4D	8	100		0	0
12 MCCONNELL Team	18 JACOBSEN Team	3NT E	2S	8	100		12	-12
13 HAWKER Team	15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team	3NT E	4D	9		600	-12	12
14 CAYLEY Team	19 HARDIE Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	0	0
15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team	13 HAWKER Team	3NT E	4D	8	100		12	-12
16 SINGH Team	20 DAVEY Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	0	0
17 HOOD Team	5 HARDMAN Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	-14	14
18 JACOBSEN Team	12 MCCONNELL Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	-12	12
19 HARDIE Team	14 CAYLEY Team	3NT E	7H	9		600	0	0
20 DAVEY Team	16 SINGH Team	3NT E	TH	9		600	0	0

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 10
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by EW	-3	300	1
3NT by EW	-2	200	1
3NT by EW	-1	100	7
3NT by EW	=	-600	11