Boards Results

2020 ROCKINGHAM TEAMS - MATCH 6

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: -50

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 DUTTON Team 7 MCNEILL Team 2 S 6S 7 100 0 0

2 MELTON Team 15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team 1NT E 5C 6 100 5 -5

3 RHODES Team 4 HAMMOND Team 2 W AS 8 110 -6 6

4 HAMMOND Team 3 RHODES Team 2 N 5S 9 110 6 -6

5 HARDMAN Team 19 HARDIE Team 2 W AS 9 140 -6 6

6 CRANSBERG Team 13 HAWKER Team 2 W KS 7 100 5 -5

7 MCNEILL Team 1 DUTTON Team 2 W AS 8 110 0 0

8 HAVAS Team 10 TENNYSON Team 2 N 5C 7 100 -5 5

9 ARENDTS Team 14 CAYLEY Team 1NT E 3S 7 90 7 -7

10 TENNYSON Team 8 HAVAS Team 1NT E 3S 6 100 5 -5

11 DUPONT Team 12 MCCONNELL Team 2 W KS 8 110 0 0

12 MCCONNELL Team 11 DUPONT Team 2 W KS 8 110 0 0

13 HAWKER Team 6 CRANSBERG Team 2 W KS 8 110 -5 5

14 CAYLEY Team 9 ARENDTS Team 2 S QD 4 400 -7 7

15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team 2 MELTON Team 2 W AS 8 110 -5 5

16 SINGH Team 17 HOOD Team 2 W AS 7 100 7 -7

17 HOOD Team 16 SINGH Team 2 W AS 10 170 -7 7

18 JACOBSEN Team 20 DAVEY Team 3 W AS 8 100 6 -6

19 HARDIE Team 5 HARDMAN Team 2 W QC 7 100 6 -6

20 DAVEY Team 18 JACOBSEN Team 2 W QC 9 140 -6 6

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

BOARD 26

BD: 26 J52 Dlr: E

6542 Vul: Both

T6

AJ62

K9876 AQ4

KQ8 JT3

K4 AJ73

854 KT7

T3

A97

Q9852

Q93

NT

N - - - - - 6

S - - - - - 11 15

E 2 2 3 4 3 8

W 2 2 3 4 3

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
2 by NS +1 110 1
1NT by EW -1 100 2
2 by EW -1 100 3
3 by EW -1 100 1
1NT by EW = -90 1
2 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 6
2 by EW +1 -140 2
2 by EW +2 -170 1
2 by NS -4 -400 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 DUTTON Team	7 MCNEILL Team	2 S	6S	7		100	0	0
2 MELTON Team	15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team	1NT E	5C	6	100		5	-5
3 RHODES Team	4 HAMMOND Team	2 W	AS	8		110	-6	6
4 HAMMOND Team	3 RHODES Team	2 N	5S	9	110		6	-6
5 HARDMAN Team	19 HARDIE Team	2 W	AS	9		140	-6	6
6 CRANSBERG Team	13 HAWKER Team	2 W	KS	7	100		5	-5
7 MCNEILL Team	1 DUTTON Team	2 W	AS	8		110	0	0
8 HAVAS Team	10 TENNYSON Team	2 N	5C	7		100	-5	5
9 ARENDTS Team	14 CAYLEY Team	1NT E	3S	7		90	7	-7
10 TENNYSON Team	8 HAVAS Team	1NT E	3S	6	100		5	-5
11 DUPONT Team	12 MCCONNELL Team	2 W	KS	8		110	0	0
12 MCCONNELL Team	11 DUPONT Team	2 W	KS	8		110	0	0
13 HAWKER Team	6 CRANSBERG Team	2 W	KS	8		110	-5	5
14 CAYLEY Team	9 ARENDTS Team	2 S	QD	4		400	-7	7
15 MAZZUCCHELLI Team	2 MELTON Team	2 W	AS	8		110	-5	5
16 SINGH Team	17 HOOD Team	2 W	AS	7	100		7	-7
17 HOOD Team	16 SINGH Team	2 W	AS	10		170	-7	7
18 JACOBSEN Team	20 DAVEY Team	3 W	AS	8	100		6	-6
19 HARDIE Team	5 HARDMAN Team	2 W	QC	7	100		6	-6
20 DAVEY Team	18 JACOBSEN Team	2 W	QC	9		140	-6	6

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
2 by NS	+1	110	1
1NT by EW	-1	100	2
2 by EW	-1	100	3
3 by EW	-1	100	1
1NT by EW	=	-90	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	6
2 by EW	+1	-140	2
2 by EW	+2	-170	1
2 by NS	-4	-400	1